← Search

Danica Knievel

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
85 matches · 52W–33L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.38
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
93%
stay 3.5
7%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.33. Lower than today’s 3.38 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 3.5
28 of 63
WA · 3.5
329 of 1209

Danica is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Danica has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Danica has gone from the 54th to the 86th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
59%
23W–16L · 55.2% of games
3.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 56.1% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
12W–6L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charlie Hsu
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Erika Walther / Ron Yehmixed
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charlie Hsu
+0.000about as expected — took 60% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
Sarah Barnes / Kim Schmanke
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marlita Bang
+0.067better than expected — took 92% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Jamie Schroeder / KC Mattingly-Nelson
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Cahoon
+0.026better than expected — took 53% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 4-6
L
Janine Perret / Danica Knievel - *
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Salome Koloffon Tella
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Evans
+0.043better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Cahoon
+0.029better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Cahoon
+0.002about as expected — took 42% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Anne Diaw / Rebecca Clements
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Perret
−0.016about as expected — took 60% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.022below expectation — took 48% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Hedi Carpenter / Tessa Chen
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shumei Lin
+0.056better than expected — took 75% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Aniki Olson / Dave Rushchamps
2025-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Jeremy Knievel
+0.019better than expected — took 45% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.