← Search

Janine Perret

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
109 matches · 79W–30L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.37
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
95%
stay 3.5
5%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.32. Lower than today’s 3.37 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 3.5
31 of 63
WA · 3.5
368 of 1209

Janine is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Janine has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Janine has gone from the 60th to the 83rd percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
10W–0L · 77.1% of games
3.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 62% of games
3.5
64.5%
20W–11L · 56.1% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 65.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history109 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Fauser
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Corey
−0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Carol Guattare / Tammy Do
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Corey
+0.021better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Amy Allen / Angelyn Regala
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with CECI BISSONNETTE
−0.009about as expected — took 68% of games against 66% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Seneker
+0.000about as expected — took 60% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Michael Grohman / Dawn Spratleymixed
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Seneker
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Corey
−0.033below expectation — took 50% of games against 63% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Salome Koloffon Tella / Akiko Leeman
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danica Knievel - *
−0.020below expectation — took 57% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Amy Zimbelman / Emily Perkins
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Garr
−0.009about as expected — took 59% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maile Intrachat
−0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Anne Diaw / Rebecca Clements
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danica Knievel
−0.016about as expected — took 60% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · with Jennie Warren
+0.017better than expected — took 80% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.