← Search

Mary Hougan

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 33W–63L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Mary Hougan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
L
2026-09-13 · EDG-Just Play-Hummer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammy Alford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-09 · EDG-Ace, Ace Baby-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rajive Kilambi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · EDG-Ace, Ace Baby-Kelly · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Borberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-06 · EDG (Daytime) One Shot Matters-Kainz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Rowland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-20 · EDG (Daytime) One Shot Matters-Kainz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edna Kainz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-30 · EDG (Daytime) One Shot Matters-Kainz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edna Kainz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-23 · EDG (Daytime) One Shot Matters-Kainz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edna Kainz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-09 · EDG-Hummer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edna Kainz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-02 · EDG-Hummer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sue Junker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-12 · EDG-Hummer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edna Kainz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-10-05 · EDG-Hummer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sue Vrana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-09-28 · EDG-Hummer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edna Kainz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 48.1% of games
4.5
43.6%
24W–31L · 48.4% of games
8.0
25%
3W–9L · 47% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 44.4% of games
8.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams