Search

Jennifer Meisner

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
99 matches · 49W–50L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.23
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
178 of 256
WA · 3.5
776 of 1209

Jennifer is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jennifer has gone from the 21st to the 33rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 58.5% of games
3.5
42.2%
19W–26L · 50.1% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 50.6% of games
7.0
75%
9W–3L · 67.5% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 47.4% of games
7.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history99 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Curtis
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 53% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Marcia Hood / Muff Heffernan
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Hardie
0.011about as expected — took 52% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Beth Flume / Kelsey Joyce
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Zimbelman
0.025below expectation — took 35% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Susan Kim / CECI BISSONNETTE
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Clithero
0.038below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Nomin Ulziisaikhan / Daye Chung
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Hardie
+0.031better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Van Ewyk
+0.014about as expected — took 35% of games against 34% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Tina L Garcia / Kathleen Green
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Van Ewyk
+0.029better than expected — took 40% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
Namchee Chan / Katherine Xu
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Perkins
0.022below expectation — took 44% of games against 56% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Hardie
+0.026better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Lindsay Terpstra / Heather Waters
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Zimbelman
0.047below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Venus Velazquez
0.001about as expected — took 44% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chardie Byrne
0.012below expectation — took 43% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.