← Search

Lori Clithero

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 117W–68L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lori Clithero to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
W
2026-08-03 · Pollock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Pollock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-29 · C-Hero’s · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy McCann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-27 · Pollock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Pollock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-22 · Pollock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Pollock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-17 · Pollock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Pollock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · Pollock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Pollock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · Pollock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Pollock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · Pollock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Pollock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-29 · C-Hero’s · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Matyas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-29 · NTC-PV4-Stone · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leona De Rocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-29 · NTC-Z-Team-Zimbelman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Meisner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-24 · NTC-Z-Team-Zimbelman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 71.2% of games
3.0
60.5%
23W–15L · 53.1% of games
3.5
60.9%
42W–27L · 54% of games
4.0
0%
0W–9L · 31.7% of games
6.0
100%
7W–0L · 77.1% of games
7.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 66.3% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 45.9% of games
6.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 30.2% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 67.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
77 matches
#1 Singles
31%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
18 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams