Search

Amy Zimbelman

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
202 matches · 98W–104L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.24
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 30 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
174 of 256
WA · 3.5
760 of 1209

Amy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amy has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Amy has gone from the 58th to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
54.7%
58W–48L · 51.4% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 38.2% of games
7.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 60.6% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 36.1% of games
7.0mixed
28.1%
9W–23L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history202 matches
L
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Allen
+0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darrin Hansen
+0.000better than expected — took 46% of games against 38% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Lindburg
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Beth Flume / Kelsey Joyce
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Meisner
0.025below expectation — took 35% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Sue Lee-Chan / Steve Hsiaomixed
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Zimbelman
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Zimbelman
+0.000about as expected — took 57% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Zimbelman
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Cat Zhang / John Stockbauermixed
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Zimbelman
+0.000about as expected — took 20% of games against 25% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Perkins
0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Kimberly Rowland / Eva Chen
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fiona Lo
0.007about as expected — took 56% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Perkins
+0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Perkins
+0.019better than expected — took 46% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.