Search

Beth Flume

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
46 matches · 26W–20L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.18
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 3.5
71 of 90
WA · 3.5
1063 of 1460

Beth is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Beth has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Beth has gone from the 13th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 64.6% of games
3.5
48%
12W–13L · 48.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey Joyce
+0.030better than expected — took 65% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Sarah Yoon / Cindy Paborsky
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erika Brown
+0.022better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jillian Hagstrom
+0.024better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Kaestle
0.033below expectation — took 48% of games against 62% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Katie Watts / Mary Turner
2026-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Huang
0.014below expectation — took 52% of games against 59% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey Joyce
0.008below expectation — took 38% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Huang
0.004better than expected — took 80% of games against 71% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Stephanie Joss / Nicole Korman
2025-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jillian Hagstrom
+0.030better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Allyson Jackson / Andrea Snyder
2025-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Kaestle
+0.034better than expected — took 58% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
Patricia Coats / Khynna Ausink
2024-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emer Hensey
0.012below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Mila Niset / Katrina Miller
2024-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonal Nyati
+0.029better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-02-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Hua
+0.044better than expected — took 53% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.