Search

Ayako Yamaguchi

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
162 matches · 98W–64L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
41 of 186
WA · 4.0
162 of 782

Ayako is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ayako has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Ayako has gone from the 54th to the 74th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
68.1%
62W–29L · 59.4% of games
4.0
55.2%
16W–13L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 47.6% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history162 matches
W
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelley Holm
+0.026better than expected — took 52% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Megan Leahy / Suzie Reecer
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Gilbert
0.020below expectation — took 35% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lam Nguyen
+0.000below expectation — took 57% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lam Nguyen
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Tia Lee / Grace Lee
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Barrett
+0.086better than expected — took 92% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lam Nguyen
+0.000below expectation — took 42% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Annie Kuang / James Boazmixed
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gil White
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chiyo Lai
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Gilbert
+0.039better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-10 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.002about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lacey O'Connell
+0.002about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lexie Miller
+0.064better than expected — took 67% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.