Search

Rachael Mitchell

Issaquah, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
96 matches · 50W–46L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Issaquah · 4.0
1 of 11
WA · 4.0
135 of 782

Rachael is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rachael has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.54.04.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Rachael has gone from the 73rd to the 97th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
71.4%
30W–12L · 56.3% of games
4.5
36%
9W–16L · 44% of games
8.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 47% of games
9.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history96 matches
L
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Omand
0.026below expectation — took 48% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Omand
+0.025better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-2
W
Lauren Kuan / Courtney Brown
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Omand
+0.015better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Blakely Tsurusaki / David Emery-Peckmixed
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bryan Cossette
+0.000about as expected — took 46% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Omand
0.052about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Ming-Lee Yuan / Christie Shan
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Omand
+0.006about as expected — took 55% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Helen Omand
0.016below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Maria Recchi
0.016below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Hanh Hoang / Nicole Minassianchamps
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Maria Recchi
0.065below expectation — took 20% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-29 · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.001below expectation — took 14% of games against 27% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Recchi
+0.014better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Kathleen Green / Tina L Garcia
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Recchi
+0.050better than expected — took 86% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.