Search

Emily Barrett

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
189 matches · 130W–59L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.93
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 31 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
79%
stay 4.0
21%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 95% stay · 5% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.87. Lower than today’s 3.93 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
15 of 186
WA · 4.0
36 of 782

Emily is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Emily has gone from the 15th to the 95th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
100%
10W–0L · 70.8% of games
4.0
71.9%
41W–16L · 56.3% of games
4.5
42.9%
12W–16L · 47.8% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
79.3%
23W–6L · 60% of games
9.0mixed
71%
22W–9L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history189 matches
W
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vamsi Surapaneni
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Hieb
+0.000about as expected — took 60% of games against 61% expected
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Scott Combs / Katherine Van Ewykmixed
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aaron Miller
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 66% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aaron Miller
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Gilbert
+0.002about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Hieb
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Tia Lee / Grace Lee
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ayako Yamaguchi
+0.086better than expected — took 92% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aaron Miller
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 70% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Hieb
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Cindy Nelson / Barry Liebermanmixed
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jevin West
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Miller
0.012about as expected — took 75% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shanifer Seit
+0.003better than expected — took 72% of games against 65% expected
7-5, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.