← Search

Heidi Sutter

KIRKLAND, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 77W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Heidi Sutter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
L
2026-07-25 · HBSQ-Hoy · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with James Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-18 · HBSQ-Hoy · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with James Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · CP - BethJoKatEug · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kathryn Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-12 · HBSQ-Hoy · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bruno Caiado mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · CP - BethJoKatEug · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Beth Lehman-Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · HBSQ-Hoy · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bruno Caiado mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-30 · NTC-Smith · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alison Tintle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · NTC-Smith · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Anna Qiu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · NTC-Smith · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Erin Link
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · NTC-Smith · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with LUISA GOMEZ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-15 · MI-Playahs-Tintle/Smith · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alison Tintle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · MI-Playahs-Tintle/Smith · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Elissa Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
73.2%
30W–11L · 64% of games
5.0
40%
12W–18L · 50.3% of games
9.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.4% of games
9.0mixed
55.6%
20W–16L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert