← Search

Beth Lehman-Brooks

Woodinville, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 68W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Lehman-Brooks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Joanna Stewart championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Susie Heimdahl championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Melisa Biscayno championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Kathryn Osborne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-07 · CP - BethJoKatEug · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Heidi Sutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · CP - BethJoKatEug · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kathryn Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-08 · CP - BethJoKatEug · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Eugenia Salvo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-2
W
2026-06-06 · NWW-CP-Stewart · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kathryn Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · NWW-CP-Stewart · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Christina Bowden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · NWW-CP-Stewart · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Melisa Biscayno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-12 · NWW-CP-Stewart · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kristi Tremble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-03-14 · NWW-CP-Stewart · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kristi Tremble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.4% of games
4.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 65.8% of games
5.0
53.5%
38W–33L · 52.5% of games
10.0mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 49.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
14 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams