Search

Christina Bowden

Bellevue, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
92 matches · 39W–53L · seasons 20192026
Where Christina sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Christina is one of 66 women at 5.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Christina has played at 4.5, 5.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

4.04.55.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Christina has gone from the 6th to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
45.5%
20W–24L · 45.3% of games
10.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 45.5% of games
9.0mixed
29.4%
5W–12L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Greg Harriman
+0.000below expectation — took 56% of games against 68% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Lauren Hummel / Melisa Biscayno
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kristi Tremble
+0.012better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alison Tintle
+0.000about as expected — took 39% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Greg Harriman
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Emily Pelosi / Elise Johnson
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Beth Lehman-Brooks
0.029below expectation — took 53% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
Anh Lao / Danielle Enright
2026-03-27 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Blakeley Bean
+0.036better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Heidi Kresken
0.006about as expected — took 63% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-13 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Melisa Biscayno
0.032below expectation — took 35% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Beth Lehman-Brooks
0.020below expectation — took 55% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Lilian Asuaje / Edie Hall
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kathryn Osborne
+0.074better than expected — took 68% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
Alex Braksator / Quynh Tranmixed
2025-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Matthew Christensen
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Isabella Wu / Akash Prasadmixed
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Matthew Christensen
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.