← Search

Melisa Biscayno

Kent, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
270 matches · 174W–96L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Melisa sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Melisa is one of 66 women at 5.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Melisa has played at 4.5, 5.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

4.04.55.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Melisa has gone from the 64th to the 25th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.5
80.6%
29W–7L · 59.9% of games
5.0
53.8%
42W–36L · 51.1% of games
10.0mixed
46.4%
13W–15L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.9% of games
9.0mixed
72%
54W–21L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history270 matches
L
Kristi Tremble / Christina Bowden
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lauren Hummel
−0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Joseph Dela Cruz
−0.004about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lora Edens
+0.005about as expected — took 56% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lora Edens
−0.030below expectation — took 46% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lora Edens
+0.015better than expected — took 48% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Lauren Hummel / Jodie Wise
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Susie Heimdahl
+0.037better than expected — took 63% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Heidi Kresken
−0.003below expectation — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Mia Nguyen / Dora Tzeng
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Beth Lehman-Brooks
−0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Heidi Kresken
−0.029below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kristi Tremble
+0.033better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kathryn Osborne
+0.019better than expected — took 53% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Alison Tintle / Beth Berris
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Susie Heimdahl
−0.024below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.