← Search

Mia Nguyen

Bothell, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
135 matches · 96W–39L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Mia sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Mia is one of 66 women at 5.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mia has been 5.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.55.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Mia has gone from the 67th to the 90th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
5.0
66.7%
34W–17L · 57.4% of games
10.0mixed
75%
18W–6L · 59.1% of games
9.0mixed
79.2%
19W–5L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history135 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Elysa Kohrs
+0.032better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Barbara Ann Andrews / Megan Bassetti
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Katie Lai
+0.013better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sara Jandova
−0.035below expectation — took 33% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sara Jandova
−0.007about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Dora Tzeng
+0.027better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-11-15 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nicholas Verghese
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Anita Miner / Brian Nelsonchamps
2025-11-08 · #2 Doubles · with Damien David
−0.091below expectation — took 67% of games against 94% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Michael Sendor / Eva Stevanovicchamps
2025-11-07 · #3 Doubles · with Damien David
+0.041better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Thai Tu / Lauren Frazierchamps
2025-11-07 · #1 Doubles · with Noah Inahara
−0.028below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Noah Inahara / Lora Edensmixed
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Damien David
+0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Hanh Hoang / Geoffrey Youngsmixed
2025-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Quentin Cheung
+0.000below expectation — took 56% of games against 64% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Rachel Aldridge / Maggie Fiocchichamps
2025-08-10 · #2 Doubles · with Eline Nelson
+0.039better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.