← Search

Blakeley Bean

SEATTLE, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 38W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Blakeley Bean to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Susie Heimdahl championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Kathryn Osborne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Melisa Biscayno championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-18 · CPCRUSHERS · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alison Tintle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-19 · CPCRUSHERS · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Susie Heimdahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-17 · NWW-CP-Stewart · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lora Edens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-15 · NWW-CP-Stewart · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kristi Tremble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-27 · NWW-CP-Stewart · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Christina Bowden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-08-10 · #1 Doubles · with Beth Lehman-Brooks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Beth Lehman-Brooks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Eline Nelson / Tricia Zhang
2025-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Melisa Biscayno championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
65%
26W–14L · 58% of games
10.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 57.3% of games
5.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Singles
9%
6 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
2 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe