← Search

Kathryn Osborne

Redmond, WA
5.0C year-end 2025
116 matches · 45W–71L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Kathryn sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Kathryn is one of 66 women at 5.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kathryn has played at 4.5, 5.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

4.04.55.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 5.0, Kathryn has gone from the 49th to the 48th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–7L · 22.5% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 50.6% of games
5.0
48.5%
33W–35L · 50.8% of games
10.0mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 45.7% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history116 matches
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Heidi Sutter
+0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Eugenia Salvo
−0.027below expectation — took 38% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Beth Lehman-Brooks
−0.010below expectation — took 40% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Beth Lehman-Brooks
+0.073better than expected — took 92% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Stephanie Quan / Dora Tzeng
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Joanna Stewart
+0.007about as expected — took 42% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Melisa Biscayno
+0.019better than expected — took 53% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Beth Lehman-Brooks
+0.045better than expected — took 65% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Lilian Asuaje / Edie Hall
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Christina Bowden
+0.074better than expected — took 68% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-01-09 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Melisa Biscayno
+0.012about as expected — took 45% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Evan Pan / Katsiaryna Skachkovamixed
2025-11-16 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Michael Costello
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Ben Silber / Olivia Rockwoodmixed
2025-11-07 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Matthew Christensen
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Loan Nguyen / Kyle Everlymixed
2025-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Michael Costello
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.