← Search

Nicole Partch

HILLSBORO, OR
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 95W–39L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Nicole Partch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
W
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Ryan Chin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Morgan McIntosh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Morgan McIntosh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · NOR-Plank · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lauren Skelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · NOR-Plank · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lauren Skelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Zach Bergthold championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Zach Bergthold championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Zach Bergthold championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · NOR-Plank · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sansriti Ranjan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · NOR-Plank · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Emilee Plank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2017–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 60.6% of games
4.5
84.8%
28W–5L · 60.5% of games
5.0
50%
8W–8L · 49.3% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
87.5%
14W–2L · 69.6% of games
9.0mixed
68.8%
22W–10L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
20 matches
#1 Female Doubles
10%
13 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe