Search

Geoff Smith

Eugene, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
49 matches · 30W–19L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.86
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
96%
stay 4.0
4%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.81. Lower than today’s 3.86 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Eugene · 4.0
3 of 8
OR · 4.0
62 of 498

Geoff is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams14 teams · 2019–2026
S OR-ESTC-Haworth-Liu
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed (M18)
2026
ESTC-Kailyn
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed (M18)
2026
SOR-ESTC-Jordan
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men (A40)
2026
ESTC-Fowler
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 MIXED DOUBLES
2025
S OR-ESTC-Jordan
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
ESTC-Brunot
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Geoff has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.52019202220252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 66.5% of games
4.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.8% of games
8.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.6% of games
9.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Madalyn Williams
+0.000better than expected — took 48% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
Dustin Shively / David Vodak
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandon Montagna
+0.029better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
James Stelson / Chris LaVoie
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Jordan
+0.001about as expected — took 55% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Andrew Mardock / Marc Baumgartner
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jon Eschrich
+0.034better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
N/Amixed
2025-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Caisey Lee Emery
+0.000about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-09-27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bobbi Kearney
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Christie Chiang / Kevin Carriganmixed
2025-09-27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kailyn Fowler
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Krissi Martes / Donald Fowlermixed
2025-09-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachael Dennis
+0.000about as expected — took 75% of games against 71% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Ryan Chin / Katie McGowanmixed
2025-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Madalyn Williams
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Jourdan Radloff / Andrew Osbornechamps
2025-08-23 · #1 Doubles · with Jon Eschrich
0.017below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-08-22 · #1 Doubles · with Jon Eschrich
+0.010about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
David Chihorek / Zach Glauber
2025-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jon Eschrich
+0.028better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.