Search

James Stelson

Eugene, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
58 matches · 25W–33L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.67
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Eugene · 4.0
7 of 8
OR · 4.0
291 of 498

James is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams20 teams · 2001–2026
ESTC-Bartlett
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men (A55)
2026
ESTC-Bailey
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men (A40)
2026
ESTC-The Other Guys
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
ESTC-Waples/OHanlon
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2025
ESTC-Bartlett/Casey
2025 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men
2025
ESTC-OHanlon
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

James has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, James has gone from the 85th to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
52%
13W–12L · 56.1% of games
8.0
50%
11W–11L · 46.4% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 36.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris LaVoie
0.001about as expected — took 45% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Steve Lindsay / Peter Mikkelsen
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris LaVoie
+0.033better than expected — took 50% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
Greg Everson / Steve Nelson
2025-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Bartlett
0.017below expectation — took 40% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
Martin Lee / Ronald Albano
2025-09-20 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Quah
+0.018better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
William Kelly / Ed Singler
2025-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Johnston
+0.036better than expected — took 53% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
James Hoesly / Greg Everson
2025-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Ziller
+0.003about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Greg Everson / James Hoesly
2025-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Ziller
0.030below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-05-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander Pate
0.004below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander Pate
0.018below expectation — took 47% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Richard Miller / Steven Schaenzer
2025-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander Pate
+0.020better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
William Kelly / Ed Singler
2025-04-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Ziller
0.005below expectation — took 35% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Jeff Barber / Jerry Dietrick
2025-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Ziller
+0.017about as expected — took 37% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.