Search

Steven Schaenzer

Eugene, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
49 matches · 19W–30L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.56
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
22%
stay 3.5
78%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 67% stay · 33% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.46. Lower than today’s 3.56 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Eugene · 3.5
1 of 8
OR · 3.5
28 of 735

Steven is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams31 teams · 2008–2026
ESTC-Yang
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men (A55)
2026
ESTC-LaVoie
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men (A18)
2026
ESTC-Golden Tempo
2026 One Doubles · 3.5 Men (18+)
2026
EYMCA-Willamette Warriors
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
S OR-ESTC-Yang
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2025
ESTC-Better than dead
2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Steven has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02019202020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 53.1% of games
4.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 47.1% of games
8.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
L
Jackson Foster / Norm Escover
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xiangkui Yao
0.055below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Sean Walsh / Herky Gottfried
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xiangkui Yao
+0.031better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Derek Snelling
+0.030better than expected — took 100% of games against 72% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Mark Nash / John Follett
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ujjwal Kumar
0.038below expectation — took 52% of games against 64% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Brandon Gallagher / Christopher Hauth
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tao Chen
0.059below expectation — took 32% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Martin Lee / Anthony Morro
2025-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Miller
+0.016better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Eric Swenson / Gary Rierson
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Miller
0.004about as expected — took 57% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Greg Everson / Robert Barnhart
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Miller
+0.004about as expected — took 39% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Michael Slade / Carl Swansonchamps
2025-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Edmund Yang
+0.050better than expected — took 43% of games against 28% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Eric Anderson / Danny Mullinschamps
2025-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Edmund Yang
+0.011better than expected — took 63% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Miller
0.047below expectation — took 8% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Marc Baumgartner / Corey Weathers
2025-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Sears
0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.