Search

Mark Nash

Eugene, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
164 matches · 86W–78L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.96
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
70%
stay 3.0
30%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 92% stay · 8% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.89. Lower than today’s 2.96 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Eugene · 3.0
4 of 5
OR · 3.0
168 of 600

Mark is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams50 teams · 2018–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mark has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 2 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Mark has gone from the 36th to the 30th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
67.7%
21W–10L · 52.7% of games
3.5
44.7%
17W–21L · 48.7% of games
6.0mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 59% of games
7.0mixed
35.3%
12W–22L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history164 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Tami Calkin
0.019about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Britani Kavanaugh / Brandon Gallagherchamps
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Tami Calkin
0.040below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Jeremy Harkin / Sarah Hallmixed
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amber White
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tami Calkin
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Celeste Sather / David Vodvarkamixed
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tami Calkin
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Rich Akers / Eric Halvorson
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Will Calkin
0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
David Gutterman / Kelley Strawn
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Henry Weathers
0.075below expectation — took 8% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Chris LaVoie / Thomas Harburg
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Follett
+0.010about as expected — took 37% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Don Hakala
+0.061better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Eric Walkingshaw / Glenn Berman
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Henry Weathers
+0.006about as expected — took 53% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-04-19 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.015better than expected — took 100% of games against 77% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Steve Parke / Gregory McCoach
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Chance
0.004about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.