Search

Tami Calkin

Marcola, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
82 matches · 44W–38L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.79
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 4.0
125 of 498

Tami is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tami has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.5201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Tami has gone from the 89th to the 85th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
68.4%
26W–12L · 55.4% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
39.1%
9W–14L · 47.1% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Nash
+0.000about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Britani Kavanaugh / Brandon Gallaghermixedchamps
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Nash
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Nash
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Celeste Sather / David Vodvarkamixed
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Nash
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Nora Knox / ELIZABETH SCHOENLBER
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gayle Larsen
+0.067better than expected — took 92% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janae Smith
+0.019better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Jennifer Vana / Amy Antoniak
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Nulty
0.026below expectation — took 44% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Catherine Wheeler / Karen Smith
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Nulty
+0.006about as expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Edmund Yang / Margaret Newtonmixed
2025-09-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Joyce
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 43% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Henry Fowler / Lela Fossettmixed
2025-09-27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Chihorek
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Rich Binsacca / Melissa Pohlmixed
2025-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Nash
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-09-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Chihorek
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.