← Search

Melissa Pohl

Corvallis, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 55W–108L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Melissa Pohl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
L
2026-07-24 · TTC-Tenacious Tiebreak Challengers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Herky Gottfried mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · TTC-Skubinna · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-20 · TTC-Skubinna · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Jepsen Minyard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-06 · TTC-Pohl · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julianne Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · with Herky Gottfried championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · TTC-Trash Talkin' Champs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Goldman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-29 · TTC-Trash Talkin' Champs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Goldman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · TTC-Pohl · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yen Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-06 · TTC-Skubinna · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah-Jane Roome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · BGC-Forty Love · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julianne Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-01 · BGC-Forty Love · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julianne Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-01 · BGC-Forty Love · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julianne Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
25.9%
7W–20L · 42.8% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 34.8% of games
7.0
43.1%
28W–37L · 50.3% of games
8.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 31.7% of games
7.0mixed
31.4%
11W–24L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova