← Search

Kimberley Boman

Salem, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 71W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kimberley Boman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Jill Ainsworth championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Jill Ainsworth championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · with Danny Tucker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · with Danny Tucker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · SOR-STSC-Tucker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danny Tucker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-30 · SOR-STSC-Tucker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Boman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-29 · SOR-STSC-Tucker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Boman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · STSC-Trisha Rutherford · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · STSC-Trisha Rutherford · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · with Jill Ainsworth championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · STSC-Stahl/Tucker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Ainsworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-01 · STSC-Stahl/Tucker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Ainsworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
73.2%
41W–15L · 57.8% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.8% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
65%
13W–7L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer