Search

Christy Hakala

Eugene, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
96 matches · 57W–39L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.02
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
39%
down to 3.0
61%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 23% down · 77% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.06. Higher than today’s 3.02 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Eugene · 3.5
8 of 8
OR · 3.5
707 of 735

Christy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams28 teams · 2017–2026
ESTC-Laurie
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women (A55)
2026
ESTC-Laurie
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women (A18)
2026
ESTC-Sets in the City
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women (A40)
2026
S OR-ESTC-Laurie
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2025
ESTC-Get Your Hit Together
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
ESTC-Laurie
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Christy has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Christy has gone from the 64th to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
73%
27W–10L · 55.9% of games
3.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 43.9% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 62.9% of games
6.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history96 matches
L
Courtney Munther / Jennifer Ablow
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexa Young-Mills
+0.007about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Jenna Wilson / Brandi Smith
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anita Geisler
0.044below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Jenell Henson / Nicole Loeffler
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Radona Peterson
0.025below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Maggie Hudson / Kimberley Boman
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Posen
0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Radona Peterson
0.006below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Samantha Robinhold
+0.013about as expected — took 33% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Cheryl Fuller / Stacey Clouse
2025-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Radona Peterson
+0.019better than expected — took 57% of games against 48% expected
4-3
W
Blair Struble / Jenna Wilson
2025-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Posen
+0.041better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Stephenie Tucker / Lisa Reid
2025-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexa Young-Mills
0.003below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Jennifer Snelling / Mee Wai Lam
2025-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Posen
+0.022better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Betsy Koehler / Asa Watts
2025-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Radona Peterson
0.005about as expected — took 48% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Jenell Henson / Noreen Kaye
2025-04-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Radona Peterson
0.012about as expected — took 56% of games against 58% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.