Search

Maggie Hudson

Salem, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
129 matches · 78W–51L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.41
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
88%
stay 3.5
12%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.35. Lower than today’s 3.41 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Salem · 3.5
3 of 5
OR · 3.5
154 of 739

Maggie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Maggie has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Maggie has gone from the 38th to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
63.5%
33W–19L · 54.5% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.3% of games
7.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 62.3% of games
8.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.1% of games
7.0mixed
72.4%
21W–8L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history129 matches
L
Garrett Kaye / Noreen Kayechamps
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Danny Tucker
0.017below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Allison Walkingshaw / Herky Gottfriedmixed
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danny Tucker
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danny Tucker
+0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 0-6, 1-0
W
Janice Couture / Cyndie Lempesischamps
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Stephenie Tucker
+0.011about as expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Stephenie Tucker
0.029below expectation — took 35% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Kim Himstreet / Lisa Johannessen
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephenie Tucker
0.008about as expected — took 53% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Cathleen Karcher / Paula Thompson
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephenie Tucker
+0.005about as expected — took 45% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
Christy Hakala / Ann Posen
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberley Boman
+0.027better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Mee Wai Lam / Katherine Gibbschamps
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · with Stephenie Tucker
0.023below expectation — took 40% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Sarah Follett / Krissi Martes
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephenie Tucker
0.023below expectation — took 48% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
McKaila Allcorn / Elizabeth Smith
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephenie Tucker
0.003about as expected — took 62% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Stephanie Swaggerty / Britani Kavanaugh
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephenie Tucker
0.047below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.