← Search

Katherine Gibbs

Eugene, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
201 matches · 129W–72L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.48
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
62%
stay 3.5
38%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 89% stay · 11% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.40. Lower than today’s 3.48 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Eugene · 3.5
2 of 11
OR · 3.5
75 of 755

Katherine is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Katherine has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Katherine has gone from the 95th to the 47th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
65.5%
38W–20L · 55.5% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
73.1%
57W–21L · 58.6% of games
8.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 46.7% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history201 matches
W
Susan Glines / Darla Farstvedt
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gloria Flager
+0.035better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Alexis Packer / Virginia Whitener
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Reid
−0.008about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Donna Jepsen Minyard / Christine Mueller
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Bryant
+0.010better than expected — took 60% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Ann Posen / Sophie Mcfaul
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Schoner
−0.045below expectation — took 32% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Angela Hamilton / Tori Waples
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Gupta
+0.013better than expected — took 55% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Patti Youngren / Dodie Wilson
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gloria Flager
+0.003better than expected — took 92% of games against 76% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · with Mee Wai Lam
+0.020better than expected — took 60% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Tori Waples / Cathleen Karcherchamps
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · with Mee Wai Lam
+0.041better than expected — took 68% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Courtney Emanuels / Anya Stekoll
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mee Wai Lam
+0.010better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Julianne Freeman / Melissa Pohl
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Gibbs
+0.019better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Bronwyn Roberts / Celeste Sather
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Gibbs
−0.007about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Cheryl Fuller / Kari Gies
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Nelson
+0.008better than expected — took 56% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.