Teams

EYMCA-Hit & Run

2026 MIXED 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed (M18)

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-27vs ESTC-MidwoodLost 03
L#1 DoublesChris LaVoie / Xiaotong Wang vs Alexa Sharps / Santiago Jaramillo0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDerek Snelling / Jennifer Snelling vs Courtney Hohenlohe Langenburg / Christopher Kamkar4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Buchanan / Katherine Gibbs vs Cary Midwood / Kira Kamkar1-6, 6-7
2025-09-26vs BGC-RoederWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristopher Buchanan / Xiaotong Wang vs Paul Bedwell / Carol Roeder1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKatherine Gibbs / Chris LaVoie vs David Seck / Jody Schatz6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGregory Haider / Janine Bryant vs Clayton Havens / Brandy Cervantes7-6, 6-1
2025-09-26vs ACB-Doubles TroublesLost 12
W#1 DoublesChris LaVoie / Katherine Gibbs vs Douglas Beck / Lucinda Fournier4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Snelling / Derek Snelling vs Helen Silfven / Guy Neal2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGregory Haider / Janine Bryant vs Andrew Mardock / Juli Parlan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed (M18) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Katherine Gibbs
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Janine Bryant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Xiaotong Wang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Chris LaVoie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Jennifer Snelling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Christopher Buchanan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Derek Snelling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Gregory Haider
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Gibbs + Christopher Buchanan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katherine Gibbs
129W–72L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Janine Bryant
22W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Xiaotong Wang
56W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Chris LaVoie
25W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Jennifer Snelling
15W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Christopher Buchanan
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Derek Snelling
0W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
Gregory Haider
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.