← Search

Radona Peterson

Springfield, OR
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
120 matches · 43W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Radona Peterson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-07-25 · ESTC-Hit Happens · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-30 · ESTC-GeriAntics · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pat Lynch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · ESTC-GeriAntics · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pat Lynch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · ESTC-Laurie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sudha Rajendran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-16 · ESTC-Laurie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Hakala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · ESTC-Sets in the City · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexa Young-Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-01 · ESTC-Sets in the City · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sudha Rajendran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-15 · ESTC-Laurie · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Laing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-11-02 · ESTC-Laurie · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Evangeline Laurie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-01 · ESTC-Laurie · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renee LaFrance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-05 · ESTC-Laurie · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renee LaFrance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-09-27 · ESTC-No Strings Attached · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marc Bagarinao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 61.7% of games
3.5
27.3%
9W–24L · 39.2% of games
7.0
29.2%
7W–17L · 44.3% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 58% of games
7.0mixed
37.1%
13W–22L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
37 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova