← Search

Dana Richardson

Dundee, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 20W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Richardson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-08-01 · STSC-Match Point Moms · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephenie Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-31 · STSC-Match Point Moms · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trisha Rutherford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · STSC-Trisha Rutherford · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trisha Rutherford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · SOR-TTC-McGowan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Koehnke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · STSC-Trisha Rutherford · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberley Boman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · STSC-Trisha Rutherford · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephenie Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · STSC-Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Schmelling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-03 · STSC-Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Bulgin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-02 · STSC-Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Lui-Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-05-01 · STSC-Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Schmelling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-19 · STSC-Trisha Rutherford · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-12 · SOR-TTC-McGowan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ranee McDougal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.8% of games
4.0
26.9%
14W–38L · 41.4% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 46.3% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer