Search

Denise Wolfe

Eugene, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
100 matches · 72W–28L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.89
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
91%
stay 4.0
9%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.84. Lower than today’s 3.89 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Eugene · 4.0
2 of 8
OR · 4.0
40 of 498

Denise is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams85 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Denise has been 4.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.54.0201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Denise has gone from the 32nd to the 86th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
79.5%
31W–8L · 62.2% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 54.4% of games
8.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 62.2% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 59.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Cathleen Karcher
0.020below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Marina Rubinshteyn / Ranee McDougal
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Mohler
0.016about as expected — took 58% of games against 60% expected
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Van Khieu / Karen Smithmixed
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg OHanlon
+0.000about as expected — took 60% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg OHanlon
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Stephanie Nunnenkamp / Chris Gregory
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Mohler
0.019about as expected — took 56% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Irene Moore / Maria Uy
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Mohler
0.028below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Jennifer Schmelling / Dana Richardson
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Mohler
+0.008better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Cindy Fonseca / Brenda Cook
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shay Kos
0.006about as expected — took 54% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
Olivia Montez / Amy Randchamps
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · with Jill Nelson
0.022below expectation — took 37% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Becky Williams / Mara Ferrari
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shay Kos
0.057below expectation — took 38% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Joy Bowles / Ebony Hodges
2026-04-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Nelson
+0.007better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Janet Sauter / Courtney Saager
2026-03-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Hale
0.051below expectation — took 37% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.