← Search

Marina Rubinshteyn

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 41W–28L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Marina Rubinshteyn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
L
2026-09-12 · LOTC-Wong · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tommy Trakoolthai mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Maysa Shakibnia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Laura Lundeen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Maysa Shakibnia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · Hit It or Quit It · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bailee Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-17 · Hit It or Quit It · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clare Belott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · Hit It or Quit It · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clare Belott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · Hit It or Quit It · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Snieder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-13 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Witty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-31 · SOR-TTC-McGowan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ranee McDougal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danica Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-10 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celene Robert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
60%
15W–10L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 51% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#1 Female Doubles
10%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
7%
5 matches
#1 Female Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer