← Search

Gabriela McIntosh

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
232 matches · 127W–105L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gabriela McIntosh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history232 matches
L
2026-08-09 · PTC-Melander/Novak · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Weisberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-08 · Bows and Roses · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Melander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-03 · Bows and Roses · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Melander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · Bows and Roses · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Melander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · Bows and Roses · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Melander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-25 · Bows and Roses · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Melander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-18 · PTC-Melander/Novak · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacob Dorau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-05 · PTC-Melander/Novak · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Austin Rice-Stitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-03 · Bows and Roses · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Melander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · PTC-Melander/Novak · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheston Knapp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-20 · Bows and Roses · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Melander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · Bows and Roses · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Melander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2016–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
72.5%
50W–19L · 58.4% of games
4.0
32.6%
15W–31L · 46.8% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61% of games
7.0mixed
60.9%
28W–18L · 55.1% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova