Search

Peter Weisberg

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
25 matches · 13W–12L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.86
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
96%
stay 4.0
4%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.81. Lower than today’s 3.86 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
29 of 266
OR · 4.0
59 of 498

Peter is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Peter has been a steady 4.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.54.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Peter has gone from the 6th to the 78th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
50%
8W–8L · 50.8% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 39.5% of games
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history25 matches
W
Simon Yee / De Xiang Novac-Yu
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Ruhmann
0.034below expectation — took 63% of games against 71% expected
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Rubin
0.028below expectation — took 35% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Pell
0.003about as expected — took 47% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
John Droege / Chris Cheng
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Logan Corcoran
+0.006about as expected — took 52% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Rubin
+0.027better than expected — took 62% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · with Jason Ruhmann
+0.050better than expected — took 86% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · with Ken Nichols
+0.021better than expected — took 65% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-04-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Drew Harrilchak
0.038below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Joshua Owens / Joe Brooks
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Boyer
+0.013about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Nichols
+0.010better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brad Ouderkirk
+0.036better than expected — took 92% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jimmy Shen
+0.025better than expected — took 52% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.