Search

Wes Schalk

Camas, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
146 matches · 81W–65L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.66
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Camas · 4.0
6 of 10
WA · 4.0
435 of 782

Wes is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams45 teams · 2016–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Wes has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Wes has gone from the 18th to the 47th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
71.9%
23W–9L · 59.7% of games
4.0
63.4%
26W–15L · 55.7% of games
7.0mixed
48.6%
18W–19L · 52.9% of games
8.0mixed
40.6%
13W–19L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history146 matches
W
2026-07-26 · VTC-Won · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alana Rhea
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · VTC-Won · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alana Rhea
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-05 · VTC-Won 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori D'Antonio
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-21 · VTC-Won 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nenette Olson
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-14 · VTC-Won · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Bernazzani
0.007about as expected — took 54% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · VTC-Won · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Trachta
0.036below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-30 · VTC-Won · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Truong
0.051below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-24 · NOR-VTC-Pickering/Hopkins · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rochelle Pluymers
+0.000below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · VTC-Won · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Trachta
+0.044better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · NOR-VTC-Pickering/Hopkins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Andrieu
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Deepak Kumar / Jing Fengmixed
2026-04-12 · NOR-VTC-Pickering/Hopkins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rochelle Pluymers
+0.000about as expected — took 65% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · VTC-Won · #3 Doubles · with John Truong
0.021below expectation — took 35% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.