VTC-Watkins

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10

Colleen Sharkey

usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 4.5

3.86

Carrie Willis

usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4

3.82

Francisco Rivera-Giusti

usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.81

Shiori Baba

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.77

Jenica Susi

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4

3.72

John Truong

usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.66

Wes Schalk

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4

3.58

Heather Watkins

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.49

Duncan Sharkey

usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 10% · published 3.5

3.33

Puntrigar Suriyaseang

usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5

Colleen Sharkey

64W–49L career

3%97%0%

4.10

Carrie Willis

121W–52L career

0%97%3%

3.86

Francisco Rivera-Giusti

126W–98L career

0%99%1%

3.82

Shiori Baba

12W–14L career

1%96%3%

3.81

Jenica Susi

74W–34L career

0%99%0%

3.77

John Truong

38W–24L career

2%98%0%

3.72

Wes Schalk

81W–65L career

4%96%0%

3.66

Heather Watkins

118W–96L career

14%86%0%

3.58

3.5

Duncan Sharkey

25W–16L career · type S

0%84%16%

3.49

3.5

Puntrigar Suriyaseang

33W–49L career

0%99%1%

3.33

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.