Teams

VTC-Won

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.54 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Yumiko Pike
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Nenette Olson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.66
Wes Schalk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Jennifer Andrieu
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.64
Michael Won
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.33
Puntrigar Suriyaseang
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Isabel Nazareth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Jeremy Harkin
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Joselito Navales
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Lee Wiegand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
Maryann Velez
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Alana Rhea
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Yumiko Pike
73W–97L career
1%99%0%
3.77
4
Nenette Olson
122W–164L career
1%99%0%
3.74
4
Wes Schalk
81W–65L career
4%96%0%
3.66
4
Jennifer Andrieu
52W–77L career
5%95%0%
3.64
4
Michael Won
72W–73L career
6%94%0%
3.64
3.5
Puntrigar Suriyaseang
33W–49L career
0%99%1%
3.33
3.5
Isabel Nazareth
7W–3L career · type S
2%97%1%
3.26
3
Jeremy Harkin
46W–45L career
0%12%88%
3.25
3.5
Joselito Navales
19W–22L career
not enough data
3
Lee Wiegand
62W–61L career · type A
0%69%31%
3.05
3
Maryann Velez
81W–49L career
0%74%26%
3.03
3
Alana Rhea
77W–88L career
0%99%0%
2.77

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.