NOR-VTC-Pickering/Hopkins

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15

David Sturdyvin

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5

3.82

Francisco Rivera-Giusti

usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4

3.77

Lorna Goth

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4

3.71

Michael Kazangian

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4

3.66

Wes Schalk

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.64

Jennifer Andrieu

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4

3.62

Kevin Muck

usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4

3.60

Marcelo Diversi

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4

3.60

Theresa Mallari

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.46

Karen Pickering

usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5

David Sturdyvin

45W–34L career

1%99%0%

4.15

Francisco Rivera-Giusti

126W–98L career

0%99%1%

3.82

Lorna Goth

124W–51L career

1%99%0%

3.77

Michael Kazangian

72W–54L career

2%98%0%

3.71

Wes Schalk

81W–65L career

4%96%0%

3.66

Jennifer Andrieu

52W–77L career

5%95%0%

3.64

Kevin Muck

64W–90L career

8%92%0%

3.62

Marcelo Diversi

67W–27L career · type A

9%91%0%

3.60

Theresa Mallari

60W–57L career

12%88%0%

3.60

3.5

Karen Pickering

156W–123L career

0%90%10%

3.46

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.