Search

Jing Feng

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2023
193 matches · 113W–80L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
201 of 399
OR · 3.5
395 of 735

Jing is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams49 teams · 2018–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jing has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jing has gone from the 53rd to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
66.7%
18W–9L · 57.2% of games
3.5
47.6%
10W–11L · 47.8% of games
4.0
0%
0W–9L · 30.3% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 65% of games
7.0mixed
78.3%
36W–10L · 61% of games
8.0mixed
44.6%
25W–31L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history193 matches
L
2026-07-26 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Shen
+0.000better than expected — took 46% of games against 28% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-07-25 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Shen
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · THPRD-Feng · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Curtis
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-15 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Van Khieu
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Wickham
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 31% expected
7-6, 4-4
L
2026-07-12 · THPRD-Feng · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Keeney
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-11 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Henderson
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-10 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Van Khieu
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Wickham
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-09 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Truong
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · THPRD-Feng 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Keeney
+0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Truong
+0.000better than expected — took 40% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.