← Search

Colleen Nolan

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
256 matches · 177W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Colleen Nolan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history256 matches
W
2026-07-26 · PTC-White/Reis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nate Larsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-07-25 · PTC-White/Reis · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nate Larsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-07 · PTC-Farris/Harrington · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-05 · PTC-Farris/Harrington · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Vendegna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · PTC-Farris/Harrington · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-25 · PTC-Farris/Harrington · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-24 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2018–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
100%
8W–0L · 68.8% of games
3.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 70.9% of games
3.5
78%
32W–9L · 60.8% of games
4.0
75.3%
61W–20L · 59.6% of games
4.5
30%
3W–7L · 40.1% of games
7.0mixed
69.8%
30W–13L · 56.8% of games
8.0mixed
54.8%
17W–14L · 52.9% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 25.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
93 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
26 matches
#2 Singles
6%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe