← Search

Sarah Ferrer

GRESHAM, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
271 matches · 187W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Ferrer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history271 matches
L
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Tarynn Berkman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · NOR-Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tarynn Berkman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-27 · NOR-Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tarynn Berkman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-26 · NOR-Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tarynn Berkman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-20 · NOR-Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tarynn Berkman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-17 · NOR-Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tarynn Berkman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Chen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Chen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-26 · NOR-Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tarynn Berkman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-19 · NOR-Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tarynn Berkman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-17 · NOR-Ferrer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tarynn Berkman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-29 · SHC-Stoica · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Erin Link
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2017–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 65.7% of games
4.0
90.9%
20W–2L · 70.8% of games
4.5
69.6%
55W–24L · 56.6% of games
5.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.5% of games
0.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 63.8% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 63.9% of games
8.0mixed
72.2%
26W–10L · 62.5% of games
9.0mixed
57.6%
19W–14L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
134 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
31 matches
#1 Singles
11%
30 matches
#2 Singles
5%
13 matches
#1 Female Singles
4%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King