← Search

Gena Franklin

Selah, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
104 matches · 51W–53L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.03
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
38%
down to 4.0
62%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 22% down · 78% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.06. Higher than today’s 4.03 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.5
233 of 364

Gena is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gena has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Gena has gone from the 40th to the 61st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.0
70%
7W–3L · 62.4% of games
4.5
50%
23W–23L · 47.7% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 62.1% of games
8.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 45% of games
9.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history104 matches
W
Robert Schefter / Anne Rojanmixed
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tyler van Horn
+0.000better than expected — took 73% of games against 53% expected
8-3
W
Dawn Degrasse / Jim Stewartmixed
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Justin Wright
+0.000better than expected — took 73% of games against 62% expected
8-3
L
Mark Chen / Sarah Ferrerchamps
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Henry Preacher
−0.018below expectation — took 42% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Flowers
+0.042better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Angela Gibbar
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.025better than expected — took 40% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Flowers
+0.010about as expected — took 58% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Martin
−0.041below expectation — took 52% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anne Rojan
+0.031better than expected — took 54% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Flowers
+0.025better than expected — took 47% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
MELISSA PISHION BOTTA / Gwendelyn Krause
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dagney Markle
+0.022better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-17 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Trent Prussing / Cassandra Dickenmixed
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cory Bemis
+0.000better than expected — took 61% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.