Search

Stephanie Flowers

Selah, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
78 matches · 23W–55L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.86
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
95%
down to 4.0
5%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 77% down · 23% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.94. Higher than today’s 3.86 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.5
342 of 364

Stephanie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stephanie has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.5202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Stephanie has gone from the 8th to the 45th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
32%
8W–17L · 42.9% of games
4.5
31.8%
7W–15L · 41.5% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 43.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gena Franklin
+0.042better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Martin
0.027below expectation — took 48% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gena Franklin
+0.010about as expected — took 58% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Alexandra Lucas / Jill Rowland
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Stewart Rust
+0.070better than expected — took 61% of games against 34% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gena Franklin
+0.025better than expected — took 47% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Amy Foley / Sandra Andrews
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chrissy Morgan
+0.035about as expected — took 25% of games against 21% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Jenny Adams / Jill Rowland
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Stewart Rust
+0.041better than expected — took 29% of games against 22% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-08-23 · #3 Doubles · with Marcie Ehlis
+0.004about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-08-23 · #1 Doubles · with Becca Johnson
0.016below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-08-22 · #3 Doubles · with Marcie Ehlis
0.006below expectation — took 14% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Karen Tomerlin
0.004below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Karen Tomerlin
+0.014about as expected — took 44% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.