Search

Jim Stewart

Yakima, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
75 matches · 32W–43L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.79
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Yakima · 4.0
2 of 5
WA · 4.0
187 of 888

Jim is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jim has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.52019202220242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Jim has gone from the 50th to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.1% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 35.3% of games
8.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 53.1% of games
9.0
50%
3W–3L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 30% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history75 matches
L
Rebecca Stewart Rust / Cory Bemismixed
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anne Rojan
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
8-4
L
Don Ballew / Kathleen Goyettemixed
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stacy Stephen
+0.000about as expected — took 27% of games against 28% expected
8-3
L
Mark Villegas / Kristin Larsonmixed
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stacy Stephen
+0.000below expectation — took 11% of games against 23% expected
8-1
L
Gena Franklin / Justin Wrightmixed
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dawn Degrasse
+0.000below expectation — took 27% of games against 38% expected
8-3
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Richard Lozano
0.050below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Robert Schefter
+0.022better than expected — took 68% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 7-6
W
Carl Bruscoe / Glen Satre
2025-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Lozano
+0.043better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Mark Jackson / Jorge Pacheco
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Elofson
+0.011better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Pane Stankovic / Derek Peacock
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Lozano
0.021below expectation — took 46% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Alan Johnson / Tom Strobel
2025-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Elofson
+0.049better than expected — took 71% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Tim Qualls / Tom Timperman
2025-10-24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Lozano
+0.010about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-23 · #3 Doubles · with David Garent
+0.007better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.