Search

Stacy Stephen

Yakima, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
148 matches · 70W–78L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.60
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
11%
down to 3.5
89%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.62. Higher than today’s 3.60 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.0
561 of 782

Stacy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stacy has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Stacy has gone from the 38th to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
53.3%
32W–28L · 48.2% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 38.6% of games
8.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
47.6%
20W–22L · 49.1% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 31.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history148 matches
L
Don Ballew / Kathleen Goyettemixed
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jim Stewart
+0.000about as expected — took 27% of games against 31% expected
8-3
L
Mark Villegas / Kristin Larsonmixed
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jim Stewart
+0.000below expectation — took 11% of games against 25% expected
8-1
L
Tyler van Horn / Kathleen Goyettemixed
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark Schaake
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 28% expected
8-2
W
Tracie Kuka / Cathy Crowson
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynne Roeder
+0.017better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Collette Jarvelin / Ashlie Unruh
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Degrasse
+0.001about as expected — took 38% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · with Erica Bjella
+0.012about as expected — took 35% of games against 34% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Tamara McGregor / COURTNEY LEWIS
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Degrasse
+0.029better than expected — took 48% of games against 37% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Jlynn Spitz / Hayley Scroop
2026-03-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Degrasse
0.030below expectation — took 8% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Philip Anderson / Tiffany Sauermixed
2025-10-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Erb
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-08-22 · #3 Doubles · with Dawn Degrasse
0.008about as expected — took 54% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
Michelle Glenn / Edward Kimmixed
2025-07-27 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelly Richelderfer
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 4-1
L
Amy Nguyen / Scott Dowsonmixed
2025-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelly Richelderfer
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.