← Search

Michelle Glenn

Richland, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 76W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michelle Glenn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-05-31 · IND-Rose · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen McAteer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · IND-Rose · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-29 · IND-Rose · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen McAteer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-22 · CBRC-McAteer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen McAteer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-03-21 · CBRC-McAteer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen McAteer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-20 · CBRC-McAteer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keziah Hampton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-20 · CBRC-McAteer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen McAteer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · with Edward Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
Paul Jilek / Alexis Siegel-Carlson
2025-11-07 · #2 Doubles · with Edward Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-21 · #3 Doubles · with Edward Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-19 · #3 Doubles · with Edward Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-08-23 · #2 Doubles · with Rathini Woodworth championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
100%
14W–0L · 77.4% of games
4.0
64.7%
22W–12L · 54.6% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 48% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
54.8%
17W–14L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
30 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams