Search

Kathleen McAteer

Richland, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
101 matches · 50W–51L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.57
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
18%
down to 3.5
82%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 11% down · 89% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.60. Higher than today’s 3.57 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Richland · 4.0
7 of 7
WA · 4.0
674 of 888

Kathleen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kathleen has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kathleen has gone from the 57th to the 35th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
42.4%
14W–19L · 47.2% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 42% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history101 matches
W
Laura Cremers / Janet Owen
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Glenn
+0.032better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Lori Robertson / Leslie Jones
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Glenn
+0.038better than expected — took 57% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Kelli Geris / Jlynn Spitz
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Xia Suter
+0.034better than expected — took 52% of games against 40% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Anne Rojan / Marcie Ehlis
2026-03-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Glenn
+0.014about as expected — took 44% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
Allison Atkinson / Erica Bjella
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keren Hampton
+0.001about as expected — took 37% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Amber McCombs / Jenny Bryant
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Glenn
+0.004about as expected — took 54% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Tiffany Sauer / Marissa Chau
2026-03-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Signe White
0.003below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
JENNIFER BELOY / Stacy Birch
2026-03-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Glenn
0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Antonella Karlin / Joshua Rogowskychamps
2025-11-08 · #3 Doubles · with Jason Chapman
0.038below expectation — took 45% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
Kara Shibata / Arthur Martirosianchamps
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · with Jason Chapman
0.002about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Jim Sichterman / Dawn Ver Steegchamps
2025-11-07 · #2 Doubles · with Jason Chapman
0.018below expectation — took 52% of games against 60% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Booshan Bharath / Sarah Twedtchamps
2025-11-07 · #1 Doubles · with Jason Chapman
+0.048better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.