Search

Xia Suter

West Richland, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
102 matches · 48W–54L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.65
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
3%
stay 3.5
97%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 35% stay · 65% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.53. Lower than today’s 3.65 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.5
10 of 1460

Xia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Xia has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Xia has gone from the 73rd to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
47.7%
21W–23L · 49.5% of games
6.0
100%
4W–0L · 65.2% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 45.2% of games
8.0mixed
52.2%
12W–11L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history102 matches
L
Lisa Bowman
2026-05-31 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.012better than expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Cinthia Campos
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.008below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Christina Cork
2026-05-29 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.065below expectation — took 8% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Kelli Geris / Jlynn Spitz
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen McAteer
+0.034better than expected — took 52% of games against 40% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Ariel Connell / Colleen Carroll Sabo
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Curry
0.060below expectation — took 35% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Daphne Reilly
2026-03-22 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.024better than expected — took 42% of games against 35% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Jolene Boughton / Shannon Robison
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Curry
0.020below expectation — took 41% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Nicole Rasmussen
2026-03-21 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.143better than expected — took 80% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Kiersten Shelby
2026-03-21 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.082better than expected — took 86% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Marianne Thompson
2026-03-20 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.065better than expected — took 61% of games against 35% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keren Hampton
0.004about as expected — took 46% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 0-6, 1-0
W
Jill Christianson / Judi Harris
2025-10-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sheila Coles
0.028below expectation — took 47% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.