Teams

CBRC-BoomeRangs

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-16vs YTC-ChoySplit 11
W#1 DoublesXia Suter / Walter Josephson vs Estelle Patten / Rick Vaughan6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPaula Davis-Vedder / Emmitt Jackson vs Cynthia Kimel / Mark Cherry4-6, 2-6
2026-08-16vs EW-Peak-CattellSplit 11
L#1 DoublesVincent Beasley / Carol Curry vs Signe White / Richard Dean Hendrickson6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesWalter Josephson / Xia Suter vs Angie Stilson / Doug Conboy6-4, 6-3
2026-08-15vs PC-Vintage SmashersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesVerlon Rhynes / Paula Davis-Vedder vs Midori Nyby / Wayne Kohan3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesWalter Josephson / Xia Suter vs Clinton Marvel / Joyce Donais6-3, 6-2
2026-08-15vs YTC-ChoyWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Curry / Vincent Beasley vs Corinne Choy / Guislain Lagron7-6, 6-2
2026-08-14vs PC-Vintage SmashersLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaula Davis-Vedder / Emmitt Jackson vs Don Donais / Patti Marvel4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKristi Thomsen / Walter Josephson vs Midori Nyby / Wayne Kohan2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Bergmann / Verlon Rhynes vs Clinton Marvel / Joyce Donais2-6, 0-6
2026-08-14vs EW-Peak-CattellWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristi Thomsen / Walter Josephson vs John Cattell / Christine Cattell3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesXia Suter / Emmitt Jackson vs Signe White / Richard Dean Hendrickson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Curry / Vincent Beasley vs Angie Stilson / Doug Conboy6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Vincent Beasley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Xia Suter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Emmitt Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Paula Davis-Vedder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Bryan Coles
published 3.5
3.19
Linda Bergmann
published
2.67
Carol Curry
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Evoria Beasley
published
Kent Ozkardesh
published
Kristi Thomsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Verlon Rhynes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Walter Josephson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vincent Beasley
48W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
3.5
Xia Suter
52W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Emmitt Jackson
48W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Paula Davis-Vedder
54W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Bryan Coles
38W–48L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Linda Bergmann
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Carol Curry
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Evoria Beasley
14W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kent Ozkardesh
42W–47L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristi Thomsen
47W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Verlon Rhynes
5W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Walter Josephson
26W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.